Chalk up a win for creative artists against AI companies. On Wednesday, the UK government abandoned its previous position on copyrighted works. It’s currently working on a data bill that, if unaltered, would have allowed AI companies like Google and OpenAI to train models on copyrighted materials without consent. Artists and other copyright holders would only have been offered a mere opt-out clause.

After significant backlash, the UK backed off from that position. “We have listened,” Technology Secretary Liz Kendall said on Wednesday. However, the government’s new stance is, well, not a stance at all. It currently “no longer has a preferred option” about how to handle the issue.

Still, backpedaling from its previous position is viewed as a win for artists. UK Music CEO Tom Kiehl described the decision as “a major victory,” while promising to work with the government on the next steps.

Kevin Mazur via Getty Images

Last year, some of Britain’s highest-profile artists objected to the government’s position. Sir Elton John and Dua Lipa were among those speaking out. Even Sir Paul McCartney weighed in, warning that the AI industry could “rip off” artists and lead to a “loss of creativity.”

“You get young guys, girls, coming up, and they write a beautiful song, and they don’t own it, and they don’t have anything to do with it,” McCartney told the BBC in 2025. “And anyone who wants can just rip it off. The truth is, the money’s going somewhere… somebody’s getting paid.”

The government will now weigh its options, taking “the time needed” to balance the wishes of artists and the tech industry. “We will not introduce reforms to copyright law until we are confident that they will meet our objectives for the economy and UK citizens,” it wrote in a report. “This means protecting the UK’s position as a creative powerhouse, while unlocking the extraordinary potential of AI to grow the economy and improve lives.”

“Any reform must ensure that right holders can be fairly rewarded for the economic value their work creates, and that they are protected against unlawful and unfair use of their work. It must also ensure that AI developers can access high-quality content.”

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/uk-reverses-course-on-ai-copyright-position-after-backlash-175630732.html?src=rss

Microsoft is rolling out a number of Xbox Series X|S updates to those on its Xbox Insiders program, and one of them has been requested by the community for years. You’ll soon be able to disable the Quick Resume feature for specific games, meaning they’ll boot up fresh each time you launch them.

As a reminder, Quick Resume is a feature that Microsoft introduced with its current generation of consoles. It lets you suspend a number of games simultaneously so they’re running in the background even when the console is turned off. When you want to return to a game that supports Quick Resume, it’ll drop you back in exactly where you left it within a few seconds, often even when it’s been months since you last played that game. It’s a pretty neat feature, and still impressive more than five years since the Series X|S launched.

But over the years, players have discovered that Quick Resume isn’t ideal for every title, particularly always-online games. When you take these out of their suspended state, they’ll often shout at you for letting them disconnect, forcing you to manually close the game down properly and then relaunch it. Other games just don’t seem to get on with it for a variety of other reasons. You can manually close any game you want at any time, but it takes a few more button presses than Quick Resume, so it’s easy to forget.

The latest Xbox update finally addresses this, letting you turn off the feature on a game-by-game basis by selecting “More Options” and then “Manage Quick Resume” on a game tile. That way you can ensure it’s only enabled for single-player titles in which the ability to instantly pick up where you left off is very appealing. It’s a change that has gone down well with ex-Xbox icon Larry “Major Nelson” Hryb, who said on X that he first requested it five years ago when still employed by Microsoft.

Microsoft is also adding more customization options to the Xbox dashboard in the upcoming update. You’ll be able to create custom background colors, rather than having to select one of the existing color options, while the amount of Groups you can add to your Home screen has been increased from two to 10. These can be reordered in the same way you reorder individual game tiles.

Select Xbox Insiders can start using the new features now, before they’re eventually made available to everyone.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/xbox/microsoft-will-finally-let-you-turn-off-quick-resume-for-individual-games-174639730.html?src=rss

Whether you love to garden or take pride in an immaculately landscaped space ideal for entertaining (or both), creating and maintaining a beautiful outdoor area for you and your family to enjoy adds immeasurable value to your property and quality of life.

If your family includes some beloved pets who also enjoy your outdoor spaces, however, you have to be careful when it comes to the plants you choose for your garden or landscaping. There are a lot of plants that are safe for humans that can poison our furry friends, so being deliberate in your choices when planning out the garden or laying out your landscaping is a must if pets are going to be allowed outside. Here are some pet-safe plants to focus on—and some to avoid at all costs.

Note that these lists aren’t comprehensive—you can check the database the ASPCA maintains before you plant anything not mentioned explicitly here.

Trees and shrubs that are safe for pets

You might not think trees can harm your pets, but they can—nuts, leaves, and even the bark of some trees can be toxic to dogs and cats. If your landscaping plan involves bringing in some trees and shrubs for shade and privacy, here are some safe choices:

• Red Maple. These trees are striking additions to any yard with their bright red leaves. They’re dangerous for horses, but safe for dogs and cats.

• Dogwood. Another beautiful shade tree with white and green flowers, it’s 100% safe for dogs and cats.

• Magnolias. If your pet is one of those critters that likes to experimentally eat everything it encounters, rest easy: The leaves, flowers, and bark of this pretty, white-pink flowering tree are safe to consume.

• Serviceberry. Sometimes called Shadbush or Juneberry, these small trees are visually stunning when they flower, and are beneficial to local birds and other wildlife that feed on the berries. Their small size makes them useful for landscaping designs, and they’re perfectly safe for pets—even the berries.

• Crape Myrtle. These fast-growing plants are kind of in-between a tree and a shrub in terms of size, so they’re often useful for landscaping, and they pose no threat to your pets.

• Camellias. These colorful shrubs are ideal for creating natural privacy screens, and are safe for your pets.

• Spiraea. If you love the look of azaleas or rhododendrons in your yard but would prefer to avoid poisoning your pets, spiraeas are an excellent, pet-safe alternative. They look very similar—full, with lots of colorful blossoms.

• Golden Bells. Perfect for edging and privacy screening, these bright yellow shrubs won’t pose any threat to your furry friends.

Some to avoid: Walnut trees, most fruit trees, azaleas, and rhododendrons.

Annual plants that are safe for pets

If you like to change up your garden or landscaping each year and rely on annuals for that flexibility, you have a lot of beautiful choices:

• Impatiens. Colorful and easy to grow, these will bloom all spring and summer.

• Zinnias. Fast-growing, so a good choice if you’re replacing a toxic flower and need some pink and red in your color scheme.

• Sunflowers. There are both perennial and annual species of sunflower—and they come in a wide range of colors, so you can really supercharge your outdoor space’s design, attract a lot of pollinators, and never worry about your dog or cat getting sick.

• Petunias. Technically, these pretty flowers are what’s known as “tender perennials” because they can come back year after year, but usually don’t survive the cold. They’re a great choice for pops of color that won’t harm your pets.

• Celosias. Colorful and unique, with spiky, tall flowers, these are great for variety and are easy to grow—and perfectly safe for dogs and cats.

Some to avoid: Tulips, begonias, lilies, and geraniums.

Perennial plants that are safe for pets

Perennials can be easier to care for and provide a sense of permanence, which is nice if you really love the garden or outdoor space you’ve created. If that’s you, here are some suggestions for pet-safe perennials:

• Asters. If you love mums, asters are a great alternative that don’t pose any threat to your animals. They look similar to mums, and come in late in the year to keep your outdoor spaces colorful.

• Coral Bells. These are great fill-in plants that will make your flower beds look full and vibrant, and they attract pollinators and hummingbirds.

• Tickseed (aka, Coreopsis). If you like daisies, this traditionally yellow flower (modern variants offer more color choices) is a safer alternative. It’s easy to grow and care for (very drought-tolerant for those of us who continually forget to water), and makes a sparse flower bed feel full.

• Catmint. Closely related to catnip, this is a great choice if you have an adventurous indoor/outdoor feline. Catnip looks like a weed, but catmint is a gorgeous purple flower your pets can munch on to their heart’s delight (yes, dogs too).

Some to avoid: Daisies, mums, creeping jenny, ajuga, peonies, hosta, and lillies.

Vegetables and herbs that are safe for pets

If your gardening is more about feeding your family, don’t assume that just because you can eat it, so can your pets. Some safe choices for veggies in your garden include carrots, cucumbers, zucchini, lettuce, spinach, pumpkin (there’s a reason it’s in so many pet foods), peas, sweet potatoes, and broccoli.

Some to avoid: Tomatoes, potatoes, onions, hot peppers, eggplant, and green beans.

If you’re growing your own herbs to use in your cooking, you can’t go wrong with basil, sage, rosemary, cilantro, dill, or thyme.

Some to avoid: Chives, oregano, mint, bay leaf, and tarragon.

Ground covers that are safe for pets

Landscaping isn’t just about choosing and arranging the big statement plants. You also need ground covers to tie everything together and protect your soil—and ground covers can be toxic to pets as well. Most lawn grasses are safe for pets (cats will sometimes eat lawn grasses to inspire vomiting; while it’s generally a natural and healthy instinct for them, you shouldn’t let them do it too much, so it’s a consideration if you let your cat explore your lawn). Other safe ground covers include moss, snow-in-summer, sedges, hardy iceplant, lamb’s ear, and creeping phlox.

What to avoid: Cocoa mulch, asparagus fern, and ivy.

Double Fine is following up on Keeper — one of our favorite games of 2025 — with Kiln, a “multiplayer online pottery party brawler.” The game was showcased during Xbox’s Developer Direct stream in January and now it has a release date. It’s coming to Xbox Series X/S, Xbox on PC, Xbox Cloud, PlayStation 5 and Steam on April 23. Xbox said Kiln will be Handheld Optimized from the jump. 

In Kiln, you’ll use a virtual pottery wheel to shape a piece of clay into a vessel and then decorate it. The size and shape will determine how much health you have, the water capacity of your vessel and your speed. For instance, smaller pots will be able to attack faster, while a larger, slower pot might be more powerful. The shape you opt for (bowl, bottle, chalice and so on) determines which special ability you have. The decorations are purely cosmetic.

In the main Quench mode, the aim is to gather water and be the first team of four to put out the other side’s kiln three times (which sounds a bit like a MOBA to me). Doing so won’t exactly be straightforward, of course. When you run into an enemy vessel, you can try to smash it, and they’ll probably attempt to do the same to you.

In one map, you’ll be able to pour water onto sponges to create barriers. In another, there’s a “disco dance floor that compels players to dance on the flashing squares for a short while.” There’s no in-game voice chat, but players could easily get around that using their console’s built-in party features or the likes of Discord.

An open beta will take place on Steam from April 9 to 11. Pre-orders will go live at that time as well. The base version of the game is $20. A $30 “Fired Up” edition includes premium cosmetic options as well as extra chips, the in-game currency that’s used to unlock customizations. Otherwise, chips can only be earned through gameplay.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/xbox/double-fines-kiln-pops-out-of-the-oven-and-onto-pc-xbox-and-ps5-on-april-23-171433966.html?src=rss

We just got our first trailer for Spider-Man: Brand New Day, the next big Marvel film. This is the fourth installment led by Tom Holland and follows the multiversal shenanigans of Spider-Man: No Way Home.

I’m about to get into some spoilers, for those still working through the MCU catalog. No Way Home ended with the entire world forgetting about the existence of Peter Parker, so this new movie will deal with the fallout from that. His whole support system is gone, though it looks like he still checks in on besties MJ and Ned from time to time.

Peter Parker may be lonely, but he’s not alone in the film. He’s teaming up with the Punisher, who is still played by Jon Bernthal after returning to the role in Daredevil: Born Again. In the comics, Spider-Man and the Punisher are long-time work buddies and occasional sparring partners. As a matter of fact, Frank Castle made his introduction in a Spider-Man comic that was published in 1974.

Bruce Banner also shows up in the trailer, potentially as Parker’s professor. Mark Ruffalo is returning to the role, but we don’t have any confirmation that he’ll turn into the Hulk. It’s worth pointing out that this is the regular human Banner, and not the hybrid version that’s been popping up in recent MCU projects.

The trailer even highlights an iconic Spider-Man villain. Michael Mando is playing Scorpion, which is a pretty deep MCU cut. The character was teased all the way back in Spider-Man: Homecoming. The footage also shows Spidey battling ninjas that look suspiciously like the Hand, who were last seen in The Defenders on Netflix. This lends credence to rumors that Daredevil could be appearing in the film.

We don’t have all that long to wait. Spider-Man: Brand New Day premieres in theaters on July 31. This is the final MCU film before the long-awaited Avengers: Doomsday, which hits cinemas in December.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/entertainment/tv-movies/the-spider-man-brand-new-day-trailer-is-filled-with-mcu-cameos-170215452.html?src=rss

Dave Knott shares a report from the New York Times: On Wednesday, the Association for Computing Machinery, the world’s largest society of computing professionals, said Drs. Charles Bennett and Gilles Brassard had won this year’s Turing Award for their work on quantum cryptography and related technologies. The Turing Award, which was introduced in 1966, is often called the Nobel Prize of computing, and it includes a $1 million prize, which the two scientists will share.

[…] The two met in 1979 while swimming in the Atlantic just off the north shore of Puerto Rico. They were taking a break while attending an academic conference in San Juan. Dr. Bennett swam up to Dr. Brassard and suggested they use quantum mechanics to create a bank note that could never be forged. Collaborating between Montreal and New York, they applied Dr. Bennett’s idea to subway tokens rather than bank notes. In a research paper published in 1983, they showed that their quantum subway tokens could never be forged, even if someone managed to steal the subway turnstile housing the elaborate hardware needed to read them.

This led to quantum cryptography. After describing their new form of encryption in a research paper published in 1984, they demonstrated the technology with a physical experiment five years later. Called BB84, their system used photons — particles of light — to create encryption keys used to lock and unlock digital data. Thanks to the laws of quantum mechanics, the behavior of a photon changes if someone looks at it. This means that if anyone tries to steal the keys, he or she will leave a telltale sign of the attempted theft — a bit like breaking the seal on an aspirin bottle.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

It is a strange quirk of fate that the station wagon has morphed from mass-market family transport into something far more esoteric (at least here in the US, a market that once embraced the form factor like no other). Now, wagons come in two flavors. There’s the “slightly lifted with some extra protective cladding” kind, designed with forest roads in mind but equally useful if you’re surrounded by people who park by sense of smell. The other variety is the one that thinks it’s really a supercar, with at least 600 hp (447 kW) and the ability to test if the kids and family dog get nauseous when subjected to high lateral Gs.

Even then, the US misses out. BMW will sell us an M5 Touring here, a plug-in hybrid wagon with 717 hp (535 kW), but it has no plans to bring over the smaller, (much) lighter M3 Touring, no matter how much we plead. That’s a shame, as the M3 Touring is about to become even cooler: BMW is entering one in the Nürburgring Langstrecken-Serie, which races at the infamous racetrack in the Eifel Mountains.

The idea started as an April Fool’s joke last year, but the overwhelmingly positive reaction from fans worked something loose, and someone in Munich signed off on a budget to make a station wagon version of its GT3 race car (the M4 GT3 EVO). It makes its NLS debut next week, with the highlight of the program being the Nürburgring 24H in mid-May. That race will also be contested by one Max Verstappen on a weekend away from F1.

Read full article

Comments

Stop me if you’ve heard this before: Meta has a new program to lure top creator talent to Facebook and it comes with hefty bonus payments. The company is launching a new initiative aimed at popular creators who already have large followings on TikTok, YouTube or Instagram and offering them bonuses up to $3,000 a month just for posting on Facebook.

Meta’s goal is to draw more top talent to its Content Monetization program, which pays creators based on views and other engagement metrics across Stories, Reels and posts. The new bonuses will be part of an initiative Meta has dubbed “Creator Fast Track,” which is meant to make the onboarding process easier — and more enticing — to Facebook newcomers.

Under the new “Fast Track” program, Meta is offering monthly bonuses of $1,000 to creators who have at least 100,000 followers on another platform and $3,000 for those that have a million or more. Creators who join will need to post a minimum number of times per month to earn the bonuses, but aren’t required to meet engagement targets or post exclusive content to earn. They also aren’t require to post video content as Facebook also reward text and photo posts, as well as Stories. 

That may sound like a pretty good deal (it is), but it’s also a limited one. The fast track bonuses will only last for three months. Creators should think of the bonuses as payment “for the hassle of starting on a new platform,” not the central part of the program, Meta’s VP of Product for Creators, Yair Livne, tells Engadget. “Our hope is that within a few months … the earnings that you see from Facebook Content Monetization will become the more important thing.” He also notes that Meta will boost the reach of creators it fast-tracks, which should help them speed up their earning potential. 

It’s far from the first time Facebook has sought to lure big names with big checks. It promised publishers big payouts when it launched Facebook Watch nearly a decade ago. It once courted game streamers for its (now defunct) Twitch competitor. A year after launching Reels to take on TikTok, it invested $1 billion in a bonus program that offered creators as much as $35,000 a month only to pull the plug in 2023.  

Livne acknowledged that it “took us a long time to find our path” to a more sustainable creator program. “We don’t have a pool structure so you’re not competing with other creators for dollars. It really is based on your performance.” 

There are already signs that the Facebook Content Monetization program, which it introduced in the fall of 2024, is working — at least for some. Meta says it paid Facebook creators nearly $3 billion in 2025, a new high for the social network. Creators have also reported that the new streamlined program is paying off. 

One political news creator told the newsletter Chaotic Era that they made $250,000 from Facebook in January alone. Publishers told Digiday last year that they expected to make “between six and seven figures” in 2025 thanks to the program. There are numerous recent posts in Reddit’s r/passiveincome forum where users report making five figures a month from the program, which is still invitation only. 

Livne agrees that Facebook’s monetization program has been something of a “well kept secret” in the creator community. “We’re trying to make it less well kept and less of a secret.” 

Are you in Facebook’s Content Monetization Program, Creator Fast Track or another creator program at Meta? You can reach Karissa by email, on X, Bluesky, Threads, or send a message to @karissabe.51 to chat confidentially on Signal.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/social-media/metas-latest-creator-push-comes-with-3000-bonuses-for-posting-on-facebook-160000283.html?src=rss

ProPublica reports that federal cybersecurity reviewers had serious, yearslong concerns about Microsoft’s GCC High cloud offering, yet they approved it anyway because the product was already deeply embedded across government. As one member of the team put it: “The package is a pile of shit.” From the report: In late 2024, the federal government’s cybersecurity evaluators rendered a troubling verdict on one of Microsoft’s biggest cloud computing offerings. The tech giant’s “lack of proper detailed security documentation” left reviewers with a “lack of confidence in assessing the system’s overall security posture,” according to an internal government report reviewed by ProPublica. For years, reviewers said, Microsoft had tried and failed to fully explain how it protects sensitive information in the cloud as it hops from server to server across the digital terrain. Given that and other unknowns, government experts couldn’t vouch for the technology’s security.

Such judgments would be damning for any company seeking to sell its wares to the U.S. government, but it should have been particularly devastating for Microsoft. The tech giant’s products had been at the heart of two major cybersecurity attacks against the U.S. in three years. In one, Russian hackers exploited a weakness to steal sensitive data from a number of federal agencies, including the National Nuclear Security Administration. In the other, Chinese hackers infiltrated the email accounts of a Cabinet member and other senior government officials. The federal government could be further exposed if it couldn’t verify the cybersecurity of Microsoft’s Government Community Cloud High, a suite of cloud-based services intended to safeguard some of the nation’s most sensitive information.

Yet, in a highly unusual move that still reverberates across Washington, the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program, or FedRAMP, authorized the product anyway, bestowing what amounts to the federal government’s cybersecurity seal of approval. FedRAMP’s ruling — which included a kind of “buyer beware” notice to any federal agency considering GCC High — helped Microsoft expand a government business empire worth billions of dollars. “BOOM SHAKA LAKA,” Richard Wakeman, one of the company’s chief security architects, boasted in an online forum, celebrating the milestone with a meme of Leonardo DiCaprio in “The Wolf of Wall Street.”

It was not the type of outcome that federal policymakers envisioned a decade and a half ago when they embraced the cloud revolution and created FedRAMP to help safeguard the government’s cybersecurity. The program’s layers of review, which included an assessment by outside experts, were supposed to ensure that service providers like Microsoft could be entrusted with the government’s secrets. But ProPublica’s investigation — drawn from internal FedRAMP memos, logs, emails, meeting minutes, and interviews with seven former and current government employees and contractors — found breakdowns at every juncture of that process. It also found a remarkable deference to Microsoft, even as the company’s products and practices were central to two of the most damaging cyberattacks ever carried out against the government.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.